My Top 20 films of 2016

Hi there,

Obviously, it just seems that this blog has been left dusty for more than a year. Therefore, I would like to apologise for not being able to do as I promised – lol. However, for this year, I am trying my best to put more efforts in blogging, so we will see it in a year if I will be able to do so.

Anyway, as usual, please find my 2016’s list of those impressive films – at least for myself, as below;

*Note: Titles listed in alphabetical order

10 Most Favourites of 2016

  • Brooklyn (John Crowley)
  • Creepy (Kiyoshi Kurosawa)
  • Hell or High Water (David Mackenzie)
  • Manchester by the Sea (Kenneth Lonergan)
  • Rogue One: A Star Wars Story (Gareth Edwards)
  • Sing Street (John Carney)
  • The Handmaiden (Park Chan-wook)
  • The Revenant (Alejandro González Iñárritu)
  • The Wailing (Na Hong-jin)
  • The Witch (Robert Eggers)

10 Notable Mentions of 2016 

  • A Monster Calls (Juan Antonio Bayona)
  • Always Shine (Sophia Takal)
  • High-Rise (Ben Wheatley)
  • Lion (Garth Davis)
  • Room (Lenny Abrahamson)
  • Son of Saul (László Nemes)
  • Suddenly Twenty (Araya Suriharn)
  • The Neon Demon (Nicolas Winding Refn)
  • The Nice Guys (Shane Black)
  • Train to Busan (Yeon Sang-ho)
Posted in Life, Movie | Leave a comment

My Top 20 (+1) films of 2015

Greeting,

Haven’t been here for a while, I’m afraid – since I have always been tangled up in  lots of works and travels, and perhaps facebooking and twittering are much easier than blogging.

Anyway, as personal routine for NY celebration, here below is the list of those films I have seen in 2015 and impressed me most;

10 Most Favourites of 2015

  • Anomalisa (Charlie Kaufman and Duke Johnson)
  • Carol (Todd Haynes)
  • Cemetery of Splendour (Apichatpong Weerasethakul)
  • Crimson Peak (Guillermo del Toro)
  • It Follows (David Robert Mitchell)
  • Macbeth (Justin Kurzel)
  • Mad Max: Fury Road (George Miller)
  • The Hateful Eight (Quentin Tarantino)
  • The Imitation Game (Morten Tyldum)
  • The Lobster (Yorgos Lanthimos)

10(+1) Notable Mentions of 2015 

  • Ex Machina (Alex Garland)
  • February (Osgood Perkins)
  • Freelance (Nawapol Thamrongrattanarit)
  • Krisha (Trey Edward Shults)
  • Love (Gaspar Noé)
  • PK (Rajkumar Hirani)
  • Snap (Kongdej Jaturanrasamee)
  • Star Wars: The Force Awakens (J. J. Abrams)
  • Tale of Tales (Matteo Garrone)
  • The Martian (Ridley Scott)
  • The World of Kanako (Tetsuya Nakashima)

Happy New Year 2016!

Posted in Life, Movie | Leave a comment

10 ประเด็นคิดได้จาก “Maleficent”

1532083_10152615124716874_3030476525848522869_o

คำเตือน: น่าจะมีสปอยด์

1. อีกหนึ่งโปรเจ็คที่หลายคนรอคอย กับการหยิบยกเอานิทานเทพนิยายเก่าๆ มาตีความแล้วเล่าใหม่ ดังนั้นกระบวนการสร้างบทของหนังเรื่องนี เป็นการเดินตามรอย “Oz the Great and Powerful” และ “Alice in Wonderland” เด๊ะๆ แบบตีนต่อตีนครับผม แล้วที่เจ็บปวดกว่านั้นคือส่วนตัวยังคิดว่าทั้งสองเรื่องก่อนหน้ายังมีลูกเล่นมากกว่าเทพนิยายจับผลัดจับผลูเรื่องนี้ แล้ว Tim Burton หรือ Sam Raimi ก็มีความสามารถในการสร้างหนังมากกว่า Robert Stromberg ที่คงเป็นได้เพียงแค่คนสร้างภาพบนจอ

2. งานภาพคือสิ่งที่ดีที่สุดของหนังค่ายดิสนีย์มาแต่ไหนแต่ไร โดยเฉพาะในช่วง 10 ปีให้หลังมานี้ เช่นกันกับในเรื่องนี้ที่ทางทีมงานสามารถเนรมิต (ไม่ใช่สร้างเฉยๆ แต่ขั้นนี้ต้องเป็นเนรมิต) ภาพในเทพนิยายให้เราสัมผัสได้ในระดับใกล้เคียงกับตอนที่คุณน้า James Cameron ทำ “Avatar” ได้แปลกใหม่ และทำ “Titanic” ได้ยิ่งใหญ่ ฉันใดก็ฉันนั้น ประเด็นนี้ขอชื่นชมปรบมือเปาะแปะโยนโยน

3. ส่วนที่ควรจะปรับปรุง (เสียที) ของดิสนีย์ในช่วง 10 ปีให้หลังนี้คือการสร้างเรื่องและการดำเนินเรื่องราว จริงอยู่ว่าดิสนีย์เคยเป็นหนึ่งตองอูนันทบุเรงยังเกรง โดยเฉพาะอย่างยิ่งเรื่องการสร้างสรรค์อะไรใหม่ๆ ให้กับวงการภาพยนตร์ แต่นี่มันไม่ใหม่เลยครับ ไม่เลย โปรเจคแบบ “เรื่องเก่าเล่าใหม่” (ที่ดีกว่านี้) เค้าก็ทำกันมาบ่อยแล้ว (ดั่งที่กล่าวไปแล้วในข้อ 1 และอาจจะรวมถึงนิยาย “Wicked” ของ Gregory Maguire) แล้วยิ่งเรื่องนี้เป็นการเล่าใหม่แบบ “ทาสีขาวทับสีดำ ทาสีดำทับสีขาว” ห้วนๆ กำปั้นบาซูทุบดินแดงห้วยขวาง ประมาณนั้น อะไรที่แบบเราเคยเข้าใจว่ามันเลวมันดาร์ค ตูก็ปรับให้มันสว่างขึ้นแม่งเลย แล้วก็ไปยัดคุณลักษณะขั้วตรงข้ามใส่ไปให้อีกฝั่งให้มัน เออ เท่านั้นแหละ จบเลย – อะไรกันเว้ยเฮ้ย ง่ายไปไหมครับผม เข้าใจว่าพี่ทำตามขนบเทพนิยาย แต่ไหนๆ จะ rationalise แล้ว พี่ก็ช่วยทำให้มันทั่วถึงได้ไหมครับ ไม่ใช่แค่ทำให้ตัวละครหลักเพียงตัวเดียว

4. ด้วยเหตุที่ว่าหนังชื่อ “Maleficent” ดังนั้นหนังจะโฟกัสที่คาแรกเตอร์ของตัวภูติ (ที่ว่ากันว่า) ร้ายตนนี้ ซึ่งอันนี้ Angelina Jolie ทำได้ไม่เลว เออ ถ้าจะให้ถูกก็คือเธอไม่ต้องใช้ความพยายามมากอะไรเลย แค่เล่นตามมาตรฐานของตัวเอง (แต่ไม่ได้เล่นเป็นตัวเอง) เพราะตัวละครตัวคือตัวละคร CG ที่แสนแบนราบ แล้วที่น่าเศร้ากว่านั้นคือตัวละครที่เล่นโดยมนุษย์ตัวอื่นๆ ทุกตัวแบนยิ่งกว่าตัวละคร CG ในเมืองมัวร์เสียอีก

5. พล็อตเรื่องเมโล๊เมโลดราม่า ผู้หญิงมีปมถูกผู้ชายเอาเปรียบเลยตามมาล้างแค้น นี่มันพล๊อต ” I Spit on You Grave” ชัดๆ แต่แค่อบด้วยกลิ่นละครหลังข่าวช่อง 5 สมัยก่อนนำแสดงโดยฟลุ๊ก เกริกพล กับอ้อม พิยดา ประมาณนั้น ที่นึกจะยัดบทอะไรก็ยัด ดนตรีก็ประโคมโหมกันเข้าไปแบบไม่มีบีทว่างให้พักหู ฉากเศร้ากลัวเศร้าไม่พอ กรูยัดเพลงแม่งใส่ทันที ฉากต่อสู้กลัวบิ๊วไม่มัน กรูยัดเพลงแม่งใส่ทันที เอ๊าาาา ความพอดีพี่อยู่ที่ไหนครับผม

6. มีวูบนึงที่เรารู้สึกว่า “เฮ้ย นี่มันเจ๋งเหมือนกันนะ” นั่นคือตอนที่ได้เห็น Sharlto Copley เล่นเป็นมนุษย์ปกติ (แค่ช่วงหนึ่ง) ก่อนที่จะกลายเป็นพี่กุ้ง “District 9” ที่คาแรกเตอร์แสนจะแบนราบเป็นกล้วยปิ้งตกพื้นแล้วถูกสิบล้อทับไปตามระเบียบ เช่นเดียวกันกับนางฟ้าสามช่า (ใช่ มันคือคาแรกเตอร์ หม่ำ เท่ง โหน่ง จริงๆ) อันประกอบด้วย Lesley Manville, Imelda Staunton และ Juno Temple ที่น่ารำคาญมากกว่าจะชวนให้รู้สึกขำ ทั้งๆ ที่เป็นนักแสดงชั้นนำมีรางวัลการันตีมากมาย แล้วยิ่งถีบเราออกห่างจากตัวหนัง ส่วนณเดชฝรั่งอย่าง Brenton Thwaites (เด็กปั้นจาก “Oculus”) หรือแม้แต่ Sam Riley นักแสดงเจ้าของรางวัล Rising Star จากเวที BAFTA ปี 2008 ก็มาโผล่ทื่อๆ วูบๆ แบบพี่ใช้ไอ้อาร์ตี้ ศรีธนญชัย 555+ ไปเล่นบทพวกนี้ก็ได้ครับ ไม่ต้องใช้ดารามีดีกรีหรอกครับผม (หรือบางตัวไม่ต้องมีเลยก็ได้ เปลืองค่าข้าวกล่องครับผม)

7. น้อง Elle Fanning คืออีกสิ่งดีงาม ถึงบทน้องจะแบน (บทจ้า บท) พี่ขอสวมบทบาทลุงตู่มอบรางวัล “รอยยิ้มพิมพ์ใจคืนความสุขให้ประชาชน” กับน้องหญิง แฟนเฉย (แฟนนิ่ง!) คือบทมันไม่ส่งตัวละครอื่นๆ เลยอ่ะครับ ทำยังไงได้ ใจคอคุณคนเขียนบทจะให้ Maleficent แม่งเป็นมนุษย์คนเดียวในหมู่มวลตัวละครในเทพนิยายหรือครับ อย่าเลย ผมกลัวเธอเหงาอ้างว้างเปล่าเปลี่ยว อ่อ น้อง Vivienne Jolie-Pitt โอโรร่าวัย 5 ขวบนั้นน่ารักมาก เคมีเข้ากันกับคุณแม่ได้ดีทีเดียว (ก็แม่ลูกกันนี่นะ) ซึ่งถ้าคุณพ่อคุณแม่อยากให้ลูกสาวอยู่ในวงการต่อไป เราก็เป็นกำลังใจให้ แต่ก็หวังว่าอย่าลงเอยแบบคุณน้อง Jaden Smith กับพระบิดาใน “After Earth” แล้วกัน

8. ชื่อหนัง รวมถึงชื่อตัวละคร “Maleficent” นั้นออกเสียงว่า /เมอะ-เล๊-ฟิ-เซิ่น/ (/məˈlɛfəsənt/) แล้วก็ต้องเน้นพยางค์ที่สองตอนออกเสียงด้วย ดังนั้นพวกที่ยังเล่นมุก “ขุ่นแม่มาลี” อยู่อันนี้คือผิดนะครับ เราขอแนะนำให้ออกเสียงว่า “ขุ่นแม่มาเล๊” แทนแล้วกันนะ (อันนี้อ้างจากที่ฟังมาจากหนังนะ ถ้าผิดยังไง รอพวกสายภาษาศาสตร์มาอธิบายอีกทีแล้วกัน)

9. คอสตูม Maleficent ฉากต่อสู้สุดท้ายนี่น่าจะได้รับแรงบันดาลใจมากจากตัวละคร Selina Kyle (“The Dark Knight Rises”) ตอนดูเธอสู้ๆ อยู่นี่นึกภาพเธอพูด ” There’s a storm coming, Mr. Wayne” แล้วมันใช่เลยอ่ะ ตบเข่าฉาดป๊าบป๊าบ ชุดไม่ต้องเตรียมมาแอคชั่นกระชับแน่นขนาดนั้นก็ได้ แหม่ กลัวคนดูจะเข้าไม่ถึงทุกกลุ่มหรือครับ เห็นคุณมาเล๊แกสู้ทียังกับดู Catwoman หรือ Trinity จาก “The Matrix” เลยทีเดียว ซึ่งมันไม่ใช่อ่ะครับ ยิ่งตอนสุดท้ายที่เธอได้พลังคืนมาจากปีกแล้วสามารถสยบทุกสิ่งอย่าง แม่เจ้าาาาาา อะไรมันจะขนาดนั้นครับผม ง่ายไปไหมครับ

10. หนังปูพื้นด้วยความสัมพันธ์ของตัวละคร Maleficent และ Stefan ในวัยเด็ก ซึ่งน้องเด็กทั้งสองก็พูดภาษาอังกฤษด้วยสำเนียงอังกฤษที่ชัดมาก (ไม่เข้าใจเหมือนกันว่าหนังเทพนิยายทำไมต้องพูดสำเนียงอังกฤษ) พอโตขึ้นมาเป็น Angelina Jolie (ที่พยายามพูดติดสำเนียงบ้าง แต่ไม่แรงเท่าน้องเด็ก) ขณะที่น้องเด็กชาย Stefan โตขึ้นมาเป็นพี่กุ้ง Sharlto Copley จ้าาาาาาาาาาาาาา สำเนียงอาฟริกาใต้ชัดๆ ยังกะหลุดมาจากเรื่อง “District 9” ไม่มีอะไรจ้าาาาา ไม่ได้รักผัวมากมาย แต่แค่อยากจะบอกว่าขัดใจสำเนียงมากเลยจ้าาาาาาาาา

Posted in Movie | Leave a comment

10 ประเด็นคิดได้จาก “The Secret Life of Walter Mitty”

walter-mitty

1. Ben Stiller อาจจะหน้าตาดูบ้องตื้นเสมอต้นเสมอปลายตั้งแต่หนุ่มจนเหี่ยว แต่จริงๆ แล้ว filmography ในฐานะผู้กำกับหนังของเขานั้นเข้าขั้นหล่อขั้นเทพเลยนะ ตั้งแต่ Reality Bites, The Cable Guy, Zoolander และ Tropic Thunder เรื่อยมาจนเรื่องปัจจุบันนี้ (นี่ยังไม่นับหนังที่เขาเป็น producer นะ)

2. ระบบเสียง Dolby Atmos ซึ่งเขาว่าพัฒนาจากระบบ 7.1 ที่ทำให้สามารถขับเสียงเสมือนจริงได้ 3 มิติ โดยส่วนตัวคิดว่าเราเองยังหูไม่เทพพอที่จะรู้สึกถึงข้อแตกต่าง (สำหรับหนังเรื่องนี้) ว่าลำโพงมันเยอะแล้วมันยังไงฟะ คงน่าจะเป็นประมาณการสักคิ้ว 3 มิติที่ดูยังไงมันก็ยังเป็นคิ้วดำๆ แบนๆ อยู่ดี

3. หนังเกี่ยวกับชายวัยกลางคนออกเดินทางตามหาอะไรสักอย่างในชีวิต ดังนั้นเราจะเรียกหนังประเภทนี้ว่า “Coming of Middle Age” ประมาณ Sideways ของ Alexander Payne ฉบับแทรกเพิ่มองค์ประกอบความมหัศจรรย์เข้าไปในส่วนที่ตัวเอกของเราพุ่งเข้าไปโลดแล่นในจินตนาการขณะโลกแห่งความเป็นจริงก็ยังดำเนินอยู่ — เฮ้ย นี่มันน้องๆ The Matrix เลยนะครับพี่น้อง

4. ด้วยการเล่าเรื่องที่เรียบง่าย มีเส้นเรื่องหลักที่วิ่งตรง นั้นทำให้หนังดูสบายๆ เหมือนดูสารคดีชีวิตสัตว์โลกเรื่องหนึ่ง พร้อมการสอดแทรกภาพในจินตนาการของพ่อมิตตี้ ชัยบัญชาเป็นเส้นเรื่องสอดแทรก ที่คอยกระตุกเบาะเดาะตูดให้ผู้คนไม่เบื่อไปกับความเนิบนาบของในช่วงครึ่งแรกของหนัง นอกจากนั้นยังชอบภาพทิวทัศน์ในส่วนครึ่งหลังของเรื่องที่สวยงามราวกับหลุดมาจากนิตยสาร National Geographic เลยทีเดียว

5. ชอบนัยยะของความเป็นปฏิพากย์ของหลายๆ สิ่งในหนัง เช่น การเล่าเรื่องของการบุกป่าฝ่าเขาเมาทะเลออกตามหา Quest (ตามขนบพล๊อตหนังแฟนตาซี) ผ่านเรื่องราวใน สนพ. นิตยสารและภาพเล่าเรื่องแนวสารคดี (ที่สะท้อนให้เห็นเรื่องจริง) หรือจะเป็นชื่อนิตยสาร Life (ชีวิต) ที่พนักงาน (ส่วนใหญ่) ทำงานแบบไร้ชีวิตซังกะตายรอวันโดนเชิญออก รวมทั้งการเปลี่ยนแปลงของนิตยสาร Life จะกลายมาเป็น E-นิตยสารแบบดิจิตอล แต่ก็ยังต้องใช้ภาพจากกล้องฟิล์มของเฮียติสต์อยู่ดี ประมาณนั้น

6. นักแสดงหลักนอกเหนือจากตัวละครมิตตี้ก็นำเสนอออกมาได้ค่อนข้างน่าประทับใจ เป็นตัวละครที่เกือบแบนเกือบกลม โดยเฉพาะอย่างยิ่งตัวละครของ Adam Scott ในบทเกรียนผู้ทรงอำนาจ ณ ออฟฟิศ ที่เหมือนโดนตั้งโหมดมาให้เกรียนเหวอเอ๋อแดกเฉยๆ ไม่มีอะไร หรือแม้แต่ Sean Penn ที่มารับบทช่างภาพสุดติสต์ (ช่างเป็นบทที่เหมาะสมเสียนี่กระไร) ก็ไม่ได้ทำอะไรนอกจากติสต์ไปวันๆ แล้วก็พูดคำคม ที่จริงถ้า ผกก. อยากลดต้นทุน แนะนำให้จ้างซันนี่ไข่ย้อยไปเล่นแทน แต่ทุกอย่างก็พอให้อภัยได้เพราะหนังโฟกัสที่การออกเดินทางและค้นพบของมิตตี้ ตัวละครอื่นๆ ก็คงไม่ต่างอะไรกับทิวทัศน์และประสบการณ์อื่นๆ ที่เจอระหว่างทาง

7. การทำโฆษณาแฝงที่ดีเป็นลาภอันประเสริฐ นอกจากสปอนเซอร์จะฟินแล้วผู้ชมยังไม่รู้สึกรำคาญอีกด้วย ดูไว้นะครัชคุณ Marc Forster และช็อตกระดกน้ำดำในตำนานของ World War Z

8. เพลงประกอบชวนให้นึกถึงเพลงอารมณ์ประมาณ Scandinavian Pop/Rock อินดี้ๆ ที่มีการใช้ซาวน์เปียโนซินธิไซเซอร์เยอะๆ ขณะที่เพลงในตัวอย่างหนังนั้นชวนให้นึกถึงวง U2 อู้หูไม่รู้เป็นอะไร ข้าพเจ้าขอชื่นชม José González ศิลปินชาวสวีดิชผู้ทำเพลงประกอบ (ส่วนใหญ่) มา ณ ที่นี้ด้วย ส่วน Space Oddity นี่แม่งโครตใช่อ่ะครับ (อันนี้ส่วนตัว)

9. ค่าย FOX ปล่อยเรื่องนี้ลงโรงบ้านเราเป็นเรื่องสุดท้ายของปี 2013 (หรือเปล่า?) ราวกับจะต้องการส่งความสุขให้กับผู้ชมชาวไทย ดูแล้วซุ๊กสุข บอกเลยว่าหนังตลกในระดับขำหึหึในลำคอ ลุ้นในระดับป๊อบป๊อบชิลชิล แต่ทำให้เรายิ้มได้ในระดับที่โครตพีค ขออนุญาตมอบรางวัล “ฟีลกึ๊ด / Feel Good” แห่งปี 2013 ให้หนังเรื่องนี้ 

10. ผู้ชมจงพึงสังวรว่านักแสดงฝรั่งไม่จำเป็นต้องรับบทอะไรเดิมที่ตัวเองมักจะเล่นอยู่เสมอๆ เหมือนนักแสดงไทย (ตัวอย่างเช่น เป้ อารักษ์ไม่จำเป็นต้องเซอร์แดก น้าค่อมไม่จำเป็นต้องเหี้ยสัด หรือแอนนาไม่จำเป็นต้องยาเสียบเตียด ฯลฯ) เช่นเดียวกับ Ben Stiller ที่ไม่จำเป็นต้องรับบทตลกเสมอไปนะจ๊ะ ขอบอก โดยเฉพาะอีนั่งข้างขวา อีขำดังลั่น อีเจื้อยแจ้วเจรจา กับเรื่องนี้ที่ตัวละครมันไม่ฮา มันไม่ตลก มันเศร้าเว้ยยยยเฮ้ยยยยย

Posted in Movie | 1 Comment

My Top 20 (+1) films of 2013

Greeting,

First of all, I would like to say “Happy New Year” and hope this 201 4 will be another great and prosperous year for everyone.

Anyway, it’s been a while that I haven’t logged onto the blog since my MA graduation. Sadly, but here on the first day of 2014, I would like to recap those films I have seen and been impressed through 2013.

Here is the recap for my “personal” 2013’s top moving pictures on screen;

10 Most Favourites of 2013

– Blackfish (Gabriela Cowperthwaite)
– Blue Is the Warmest Colour (Abdellatif Kechiche)
– Conjuring, The (James Wan)
– Gravity (Alfonso Cuarón)
– Inside Llewyn Davis (Joel and Ethan Coen)
– Prisoners (Denis Villeneuve)
– Rush (Ron Howard)
– Snowpiercer (Bong Joon-ho)
– Spring Breakers (Harmony Korine)
– Tang Wong (Kongdej Jaturanrasamee)

 

10(+1) Notable Mentions of 2013 

– Act of Killing, The (Joshua Oppenheimer and Christine Cynn)
– Blue Jasmine (Woody Allen)
– Don Jon (Joseph Gordon-Levitt)
– Frozen (Chris Buck and Jennifer Lee)
– Great Gatsby, The (Baz Luhrmann)
– Like Father, Like Son (Hirokazu Koreeda)
– Mary is Happy, Mary is Happy (Nawapol Thamrongrattanarit)
– Misérables, Les (Tom Hooper)
– Only God Forgives (Nicolas Winding Refn)
– Secret Life of Walter Mitty, The (Ben Stiller)
– Paradoxocracy (Pen-Ek Ratanaruang and Pasakorn Pramoolwong)

 

2014….BRING IT ON!!

Posted in Life, Movie | Leave a comment

How does the representation of the postmodern city and its people in The Perfect Blue (1998) and Paprika (2006) offer a neo-noir vision of urban space?


The Perfect Blue (1998) / Paprika (2006)

Directed by Satoshi Kon

How does the representation of the postmodern city and its people in The Perfect Blue and Paprika offer a neo-noir vision of urban space?

Speaking of contemporary Japanese film makers who really impact the world by their cinematic works, if there is the name of Satoshi Kon, the animator, appearing in that list, this will not be a surprise at all. Regarding to his launched animation works, he started working on his theatrical career by The Perfect Blue, a psychological-thriller animation released in 1995, this film really stunned the audience by its spectacularly visual and narrative style, so this film was highly praised by film critics, as well as a good feedback from general audience after the screening (Napier, 2005). This action made Kon’s name very well-known as a prospective animator, as well as a film maker.

Kon’s following works were also produced continuously such as Millenium Actress (2001), Tokyo Godfather (2003), and very recently in 2006, Kon released his another animated feature named Paprika, teaming with Sony Pictures Classic, presenting the futuristic sci-fi thriller story, this film was also given positive feedbacks not only in Japan but also in the international level besides Hayao Miyazaki and his animation production house. As Andrew Osmond mentioned in his book, Satoshi Kon: The Illusionist (2008), that Paprika is the great way to introduce Kon to international audience, especially the Westerns, by director’s thematic message, twisted way of narrating and captivating the audience with the fantasy visualisation.

The global success really proves that Satoshi Kon is absolutely considered as one of the world-class film makers, so do his works, especially his debut film, The Perfect Blue and his latest work, Paprika. These two animations are outstandingly projecting the life of people living in Japanese urban space through their twisted-thrilling narrativity, as well as the protagonists appearing in the films. Exactly the same as other films which can literally represent the society and people, these Kon’s animation works, The Perfect Blue and Paprika, are also used reflecting these elements through the imaginary space on film by their simulated settings, crime, fictional characters, or their fantasised and ambiguous behaviours,  which can possibly use as a text to study the social representation, especially the postmodern city and its people, that reflects through the way these two animation films are presented on screen.

Consequently, city settings and people are important factors of film which present the neo-noir vision of urban space.  In this paper, The Perfect Blue and Paprika will be raised as an example illustrating the neo-noir aspects in film, which proceed the story on these urban settings, by observing these fictional characters living their life in an urban city. Therefore after this cinematic observation, we can understand how these Japanese animation features offer their visual and thematic style that we can possibly call them as neo-noir films, which really focus on the noir content rather than the noir visualisation.

City – Cinematic Space

City and film are mutually influent to each other, film projects or simulates the city as its setting where the film’s story takes place, while the city often shapes itself according to its reflection on screen. In Cinema and the City: Film and Urban Societies in a global context (2001), Mark Shield mentioned about the relationship between city and film is that “Thematically, the cinema has, since its inception, been constantly fascinated with the representation of the distinctive spaces, lifestyles and human conditions of the city from the Lumiere Brothers’ Paris of 1895 to John Woo’s Hong kong of 1995”. This really indicates that film and city are tightly attached to each other in a very close relationship, the same way that Film Studies do as an interdisciplinary conjoined factor to other social sciences such as Cultural Studies or Sociology.

Although basically the term of Postmodernism, particularly postmodern city, is seemingly new for people outside the academic field, as long as we, humans, are still related ourselves to our city or culture, we cannot escape perceiving this academic term. David Harvey described in The Condition of Postmodernity: An Enquiry into the Origins of Cultural Change (1990) that the postmodern city is a space which has a connection to the rise of historical eclecticism, multiculturalism, and spectacle. From this sentence, we can understand that postmodern city is formed by the consistence of these three elements which are inventing tradition by imitating the older forms, local or ethnic cultures and commercialization of built environment, as given further explanations in Urban Design in the Postmodern Context (Velibeyoglu, 1999).

The postmodern city is absolutely the same as other city which can be projected or represented by film as well. Likewise through these two animation films by Satoshi Kon, we can absolutely feel the sense of that they are really presenting the story of the postmodern city and also its people. The Perfect Blue is a reflection of contemporary Japanese society which contains many postmodern elements such as the metropolis setting in which people lost their connection or misidentified themselves because of the human-invented technology, or the role of media which dominate the life of these characters in film. Likewise, in the film Paprika, the film story is told through the futuristic and fantasised metropolis setting, considered as Tokyo, which give the characters, as well as their city setting, the misplaced or misidentified feeling that turns into the conflict in the film.

Representation of Neo-Noir in urban space

Generally, in Neo-Noir: the New Film Noir Style from Psycho to Collateral, the word “noir” and “neo-noir” are styles of filming that supposedly made around the 1940s and kept continuing their visual and thematic influence to the film production in the twenty-first century (Schwartz, 2005). While noir films are considered as films which were produced by French film makers during the classical noir period or 1940s, neo-noir films are used for contemporary noir film, especially for the post-classical noir film, based on American film studios.

In fact, neo-noir films are almost the same as classic noir films, by its style of composed visual elements or themes of violence and crime. According to the book The Philosophy of Neo-Noir, Mark T. Conard claims that the term “neo-noir” is used only to describe any films coming after the classic noir period, these films still have particular elements of “noir” that contain the theme about the ambiguity in morality and anti-hero protagonists These elements totally give the audience noir sensibility. However, he still adds in his same book that there are some upgraded aspects in each film such as the influnce of psychological element or modern technology, which intentionally provide the audience more sense of up-to-date noir contents. Through these films, we may be able to classify their neo-noir appearances by these following aspects.

Multicultural Elements

As mentioned in this article about the postmodern city, muticulturalism is one of the noticeable characters of the postmodern city, so does the neo-noir film. In this sub-genre of noir, these multicultural aspects are totally affecting the city and its people. We can notice this presentation of multicultural society in The Perfect Blue and Paprika, it is possible to say that these fictional Japanese cities are really imitating the reality.

In these modern days, Japan, and its capital Tokyo, is considered as the powerful country with high-paced living culture, like other metropolis such as New York or London. Technologies and facilities of this city are fully developed, which really help Tokyo grow much rapidly, comparing to other Asian countries. This is really the reason why Japanese people have a very quick access to any information from around the world which help them update their way of living. But in the same time, Japanese people are also conservative, because they have their own cultures which have been forwarded through many generations. Therefore, contemporary Japanese culture is the mixture, between domestic, or old way of living, and imported aspects. This seems to be the cultural duality by which Japanese people are living their life during these present days.

This element really affects to the life of fictional characters presented in both animation film, The Perfect Blue and Paprika. Although, in the first film, we may feel less senses of multicuturalism than the second one, but in fact there are still these elements appearing in film anyway. The Perfect Blue shows the audience that the crime is committed after Mima, the protagonist, decides to abandon her shojo or lolicon idol image, which is totally a famous part of Japanese modern culture, transforming herself to be a sexy-looking actress, which has been adapted from the image of a Hollywood or Western actress.

While The Perfect Blue is presenting the shape of muticulturalism through the transformation of Mima’s identity, in Paprika, there are many multicultural elements, illustrated during the film. Especially, in the parade, Kon intends to put this variety of cultures in the scene where we can notice the elements presented in the dream parade. In this scene, those people who gather in the parade represent the muticulturalist aspects in Japan such as we can see the Japanese dolls walking in the parade alongside with Russian dolls, as well as other Werstern-style-dressing dolls. Besides that, we can see other cultural representation joining in this parade for example, the Chinese warriors, the American Statue of Liberty, the European Knight’s armour or the Siamese dancing girl etc.

In addition, in the film Paprika, Kon still puts these muticultural elements presenting through the role of Paprika, as we know that she is a character in dreamland, so she is capable of trasforming herself into many ways, including her costumes. In many scenes, the way that Paprika’s dressing absolutely show the multicultural aspects such as the Chinese dress she wears when she is helping her chief from the parade, Sun Wukong or the Monkey King costume from the Eastern famous mythology Journey to the West or the green fairly-looking dress, as Peter Pan’s Tinker Bell, these are the good examples of multicultural elements in this film which are also considered as neo-noir characteristics presented in films, according to the result of them.

During these films, these multiculturalists are invading the peace of city and its people, especially in Paprika, the multicultural-toy parade is ruining the normal way of living, forcing them to join the parade line unconsciously which lures them from their unique identity and brings the city a chaotic situation, so do other postmodern city, where people do not know exactly who they really are according to the social-border abolishment which merges people from different culture, ethnicity or class together, turning them into one final society in which everybody is not different at all and putting the neo-noir paranoid ambient; not knowing the inner mind of each other, into these animation films.

Double identity characters

The idea of double-identity, especially in the protagonists, seems to be the distinguished neo-noir element presenting in these films.Since the first part of each film, we can notice that protagonists always relate themselves to the mysterious or unsolved crime which turns to be worse after that they feel uncertain about their own self, doubting their “second” identity as a crime committer. In The Perfect Blue, Mima Kirigoe, an ex pop-idol from the J-pop (Japanese-pop) group called “CHAM!”, decides to leave the group, neglecting her idol image and becoming an actress in a TV-serie called Double Bind. This decision really makes Mima have two identities; an ex-pop idol and a newcomer actress. Similarly, in Paprika, Docter Atsuko Chiba, the leading character of the story, is a psychiatrist who treats her patients by going inside their dreams under of her alternate identity named Paprika. While Atsuko seems very frosty and serious, differently, her alternate identity, Paprika, is more charming, easy-going and friendly.  This is also the double-identity presenting through the film’s  protagonist.

This negative effect of double-identity characteristic is noticeable in The Perfect Blue, in the film we, the audience, will not even know which character committed those criminal acts, according to its noir story-telling style that everyone such Mima, her unconcious self, her stalker, or anyboby around her could be that mysterious serial-killer. At the last part of film, we can see Mima’s dissociative identity disorder symptom, she does not know which identity; a pop idol or an actress, is really herself. These symptoms are exaggerated through the use of rapidly jump cuts, fascinating fantasy such as the ghostly Mima’s doppelganger, and by the foreshadowing of plot points through filmed scenes for the psychological thriller TV series in which Mima takes part, as well as the haunting repetition of Mima’s saying “who are you” entire the film.

In the mean time, in Paprika, the coexistence between Atsuko and Paprika, as well as the connection between reality and dream, turns to be a problem to the audience or other characters in film, because it seems very difficult to identify which one is real and which one is only an fantasised identity. This ambiguity in protagonist’s self which causes the misconception of identity gives the suspicious emotion to the audience, petrifying them with the narrativity of these neo-noir stylish animations.

The influence of  human’s inventions

Originally, crime is the most outstanding aspect which we can see in general noir films, so do neo-noir films. The appearance of criminal behaviours is still existing in this sub-genre of  noir film. In the postmodern city, like settings of The Perfect Blue or Paprika, crime is not only a man-made action, but also because of those man-made invented technologies such as computer, internet, TV-serie, film or other scientific inventions. In these animation films, these technological divices are the main cause, which starts all the important conflicts in each film.

Clearly, in Paprika, Kon presents that he really concerns about the influnce of modern technologies which dominate our life nowaday. In the film, the DC-mini,  the dream projecting machine, has been stolen from laboratory and been used as a terrorist divice to destroy the fictional reality in film. The DC-mini is the same device which Dortor Atsuko (or Paprika) uses for examining her client’s mind, this seems to be a good thing for modern medical treatment, curing people’s mental problem through their dream, as soon as the villain steals it, it turns to be an evil’s tool to ruin this postmodern city. All entire the film, Doctor Seijiro Inui, the chairman of Atsuko’s scientific institution always mentions about the immorality of interfering or intruding other people’s dreamland, he says that dream is the sacred place only for its owner, not for general audience. But he finally accepts this device and turns to be a villain himself, using the DC-mini to control and to damage the city in order to fulfil his greed of power by merging dreams into reality. This is really showing a curse which is driven by human’s scientific inventions.

In the same way, in The Perfect Blue, Mima’s identity is shaped and forwared  by media such as newspaper, magazine, television or radio. According to her idol career, her life, as well as her personal life, might be unavoidably followed by those newspaper or tabloid journalists, evem stalkers who are always creepingly following their beloved idol. This lack of personal privacy is totally caused by this existence of media which is influent the image of Mima, herself, in the film and drives her to be jeopadised under her mental malfunctioning situation.

These looks like a parory, mocking the postmodern city where people are always depending themselves on technologies without paying attention to their necessity. In Paprika, there is a parade scene where the people, who are spelt in dream and are transformed to many human-invented things thanks to their fantasy, are parading and celebrating along the city street. In this final scene’s parade, there are many people who are transformed into creatures with the shape of technological equipments such as Japanese school girls with mobile-phone shaped head, salary men who transforms to be the walking musical intruments, or Doctor Tokita who changes himself into a robot. This curse causes the city and its people to encounter the apocalypse. This fictional problem presents the neo-noir aspect about the over-usage of modern technology which seems convenient but, in fact, harmful on the other hand. Eactly the same as a classic noir character who has lots of faces hidden in himself, this really turns the setting into the city of crime, not the prospective one.

References

Bould, Mark, Glitre, Kathrina, and Tuck, Greg (Eds.). Neo-Noir. London: Wallflower Press, 2009.

Conard, Mark T. (Eds.).  The Philosophy of Neo-Noir. Kentucky: The University Press of Kentucky, 2009.

Harvey, David. The condition of postmodernity : an enquiry into the origins of cultural change. Cambridge: Blackwell, 1990.

Mes, Tom, and Sharp, Jasper. The Midnight Eye Guide to New Japanese Film. California: Stone Bridge Press, 2004.

Napier, Susan. Forward. Anime: From Akira to Howl’s Moving Castle. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005. XVII.

Osmond, Andrew. Satoshi Kon: The Illusionist. California: Stone Bridge Press, 2008.

Paprika. Dir. Satoshi Kon. Writ. Yasutaka Tsutsui, Seishi Minakami. Perf. Megumi Hayashibara, Toru Furuya, Koichi Yamadera. Sony Pictures, 2007. DVD.

Schwartz, Ronald. Introduction. Neo-Noir: the New Film Noir Style from Psycho to Collateral. Oxford: The Scarecrow Press, 2005. pp. IX-XIV

Shield, M. and Fitzmaurice, T. (Eds.). Cinema and the City: Film and Urban Societies in a global context. Oxford: Blackwell, 2001.

The Perfect Blue. Dir. Satoshi Kon. Writ. Sadayuki Murai, Yoshikazu Takeuchi. Perf. Junko Iwao, Rica Matsumoto, Shinpachi Tsuji. Manga Video, 2002. DVD.

Velibeyoglu, Koray.  Urban Design in the Postmodern Context. Ph.D Diss. Izmir Institute of Technology, 1999. 10 January 2010. Web. http://www.angelfire.com/ar/corei/ud.html.

Posted in Movie | 1 Comment

The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari: German Expressionism – Visually and Thematically

 

The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari (1920)

Directed by Robert Weine

: German Expressionism – visually and thematically

Throughout the world film history, It is able to say that The Cabinet of Dr Caligari, is one of the most regarding films during the European Avant-Garde current that influence and inspire many films in the following generation, especially in the “film noir” and “horror” genre in which both obviously demonstrate the duality of human’s inner or subconscious mind that often stands ambiguously between bright and dark side. This master-piece work of Robert Weine, German film director, is the great example of a film which perfectly adapts the artistic elements into its visualisation in order to create the strange fictional world and to scribble the thematic message in the audience’s heart during the film screening.

As globally wide-known, this film had been labelled as a film which represented the artistic style of German Expressionist movement in the early period. This art movement was occurring in Germany during the 1920s after German armed forces had been defeated in the World War I and German nation had been controlled under the American government. In that era, German citizens were widely traumatised to face the truth about their domestic economic depression, American cultural colonization and lastly invaded national politics. Seemingly, the reality was very intolerable for these German people whose nation once used to be considered as the world’s major country, therefore, they turned themselves into arts, especially these narrating arts such as theatres and films to enjoy the fictional world as an imaginary escapism which they used for neglecting that tormented reality.

According to that era, Sigmund Freud, an Austrian neurologist, had discovered the theory about the psychoanalysis which mainly focuses on the power of human’s inner mind which was subsequently spread and accepted throughout the world, German Expressionist arts were also examining unconsciousness forces which silently motivate men to do something which are unpredictably turning into good or evil side. The same way as this film, Wiene’s The Cabinet of Dr Caligari followed the influence of this psychological theory by doubting how terrifying human may become under the shadow of insanity or unconsciousness. We can clearly see that through the entire film the director intensively put all visual elements to persuade us, the audience, into the world of insanity to enlighten the theme which he wants us to understand. Regarding to the subconscious power, Weine wanted the audience to see the uncertainty of human’s mind which is far deeper than our perceptions are able to be predicted or understood clearly. Therefore, there are some aspects in this film which significantly involves with the idea of mind control, dual identity and psychological terror.

The most outstanding element of this German silent film is its visualisation which can be departed into two sections: artistic element and narrative element. These marvellously designed visual elements are used as important parts in proceeding the narrativity of The Cabinet of Dr Caligari and in the same time also driving audience’s thematic involvement during watching this film.

Without a doubt, the first thing that audience in that era and also in these days must notice at the first glance after seeing this film is certainly its artistic elements. It is able to say that art direction of The Cabinet of Dr Caligari is very outstanding and impressive not only in that period of making but also for all time.

First of all, audience must be stunned by distorted and unnatural mise-en-scènes which were distinctively presented as one of the characters in this film. The director decided to use the settings which are designated to be a representation of a German rural town where this narrated story has taken place in a different style as normally used in that realist period, we can obviously see that all settings are all presented through painting arts. Not only the man-made construction such as houses, walls or roads but also the natural scenic landscapes like hills, these settings are constructed or simulated in the same way as they often do with the theatre. While other film directors in that moment were trying to find a way to capture the reality into their films, Weine chose his path differently by using these painted settings and added some distorted angles on the scene in asymmetrical and distorting style for examples; in reality building’s walls are supposed to be perfectly upright on earth surface, but in this film we can see all of walls or houses were constructed in a strange and slanting composition, or otherwise we may see the scene which Cesare carry a girl upwards the illustrated setting of hill, that hill was also an example of the disharmonious composition in artistic setting by which the director intended to lead the audience to the theme of human’s mentally uncertainty.

As well as settings, scenic properties, such as doorway, windows, mirrors or chairs, using in the scene were also created asymmetrically, for instant, those chairs and tables which were set in the scene with civil officers or town clerks are unnaturally tall, while the doors or stairways used by characters in film are such unrealistically distorted. Moreover, light is also projected through painting in this film, to draw the highlight in the scene. In every scene, besides using paint on the walls, Weine also designed to paint the floor and some of the wall of the setting in high-coloured tone to differentiate the accentuated light from the normal one on which the main character may stand in scene in order to keep the attraction of the audience focusing on that highlighted position.

The film lighting usage, especially the key and tone of light, is definitely reflecting the ambiguity of men’s inner mind. Most of the scenes on The Cabinet of Dr Caligari were projected in low-key lighting together with the using of sharp tone lighting technique, creating the exaggerated contrast between light and shadow which is called optionally as “Chiaoscuro technique”. Throughout the film we can often see that the protagonists such as Dr Caligari, Cesare, or the narrator are mostly screened by sharpened shadows on their face which may represent their dark side identity or malicious inner mind of a man.

So we can see these unnaturally composited mise-en-scènes were frequently projected through distorted artistic elements. Weine intended to signify literally these visual presentations to the anxiety, emotional disharmony or uncertainly terror of protagonists or those characters who take the role in the scene which were set in every scene symbolically to stream the expression of inner unstated mind of protagonists and other characters in film, and also to tell the message of story to the audience indirectly.

Secondly, It is noticeable that narrative element of this moving image is very interesting, especially the narrativity. In this film, the director intends to tell the story about the Dr. Caligari, the mad scientist and his cruel somnambulist fellow, Cesare, whose action has involved in homicide cases in a small unnamed town in Germany. The story has been told entirely to us since the beginning through the flashback point of view of a young man, who sits and tells to terrifying story to his companion for entire the story. The director wished to slowly persuade us, the audience, to follow his mythical tale, surprisingly, he twisted its end by revealing that all this story are narrated through the point of view of an insane patient who has his medical treatment in an asylum and fantasise that his psychiatrist is the mad Dr Caligari, and so do other characters, all of these people taking their part in the film such as Cesare or the girl are mental disorder patients who live in the same asylum as his.

For inventing the distorted world of reality, in characterisation, the director intentionally created the story via the perspective of a mad man, so all the characters were designed to have distorted behaviours, as well as their acting which seem really exaggerating, unrealistic and irrational like the way of insane mind functions in general. On the contrary, we never feel like being disturbed by these unnatural characterisations, although they may perform their acting very strangely. No matter how weird they and their world really are, we will keep following the story and getting ourselves involved into the film without tuning out. By this spectacular way of creating its narrated story, it can be assumed that the director wanted to show the fact that we, the audience, may never perceive the truth easily whether the person to whom we are talking is normal-minded or not, and how terrifying abnormal minds exactly are. This psychological truth alienates us from the film and presents a self-reflection which designates ourselves to re-examine and question our mental condition, in the same time to warn us about normal-look people whom we meet on the street or neighbouring houses in the real world, these people may surprisingly associate with insanity and be harmful or dangerous in any unexpectedly occasions.

Finally, from all these examples of visual style used in the film The Cabinet of Dr Caligari, it is able to say that this German Expressionist film has proved itself that besides demonstrating the reality, this film can also present efficiently distinctive expressionist visual style by which character’s internal state of mind is literally represented, relating to the illustrated theme of madness, insanity and human’s subconscious. Its complex and stylised visualisation exactly represents the emotional disharmony of the characters, as well as human beings in general, and deliver the emphasised thematic message to the audience at the end of the film. These are obviously the evidences that present how Weine’s The Cabinet of Dr Caligari functions visually through the perception of the audience and also explains the relationship between its theme and its visual style which are presented mutually throughout the film.

Anybody is able to be Dr. Caligari, himself, why not ?

Posted in Movie | 4 Comments

Time: Becoming Selfless

Time (2006)

Directed by Kim Ki-Duk

: Becoming selfless, a new concept of plastic surgery


As many people say…“Time” can bring men or women something they love.

On contrary…“Time” can also separate them apart.


However, how it is going to be when a woman decides to let the plastic surgery cease the time from stealing her love, her life and her everything.


Many film-watchers in Thailand seems to know and to understand very well about Korean films, according to their cultural current which has been sweeping through Thailand and other continents during these recent years. But, surprisingly, the works of Kim Ki-Duk, the world-famous Korean filmmaker, are rarely known for Thai people. Only a small group of Thai Indy film goers who recognize this Korean director and his works.

It is able to say that Kim Ki-Duk is one of the contemporary filmmakers whose works have been highly praised by the film critics in the international level for the strong and manful content, which reflects the interesting life of real Korean people in elaborated story-telling, the same method as many artists do in the brilliant oil-color painting.

His style of making films is very outstanding from other Korean filmmakers by eliminating and escaping the same-old rules of filming in both content and technique, especially in order to reflect the morality and the dark side of contemporary people living in Korea in a twisted realist way.

In many of his films, the characters are normally designed to be a fringer who lives in the edge of the society such as a Buddhist monk who tries to banish himself out off the Karma cycle in Spring, Summer, Fall, Winter…and Spring (2003), a young strayed motorcycle-rider who runs into a desperate housewife in 3-Iron (2004), an old man who waits to marry with his adopted girl in The Bow (2005), etc. These designed characters are all representing humans who have their own identities in Korean society which Kim Ki-duk often uses them to describe his social-criticized opinions through their point-of-view. Consequently, Kim’s works are totally realistic and fascinating, but, in the same time, give the audience the sense of despair and misery.

The film called Shi Gan or Time, in English title, is one of the recent works of this talented filmmaker, launched in the year 2006. The first difference from Kim Ki-Duk’s past works that many film-watchers must notice is dialogue; it seems very surprised that in this film there are more dialogues which characters are talking to each other than usual. Normally, in his works, dialogue is not necessary, story will be narrated through acting more than speaking, so his films is quite silent. Strangely, we can see the two protagonists yelling at each other in this film for many times.

Second noticeable difference of this film is its protagonists are middle-class people who have house, money and almost luxurious life. As we all know that in his past works, Kim’s main characters are mostly in the lower-class society or in the dark side of city like a police-runaway criminal who dodges himself in a floating house in The Isle (2000), a pimp who drags his beloved woman to work as a prostitute at his whorehouse in Bad Guy (2001) or a girl who sacrifices herself having sex with middle-aged men to redeem them in Samaritan Girl (2004), these characters are all presented the life of working-class or lower-class people. Surprisingly, in Time Kim chooses to tell the story of well-living people who have enough money to spend in daily coffee drinks, luxurious flats or, absolutely, plastic surgery fees.

This film tells the story of a young Korean couple, Ji-woo and Seh-hee, who live together for a period of time, film begins with horrifying footages of plastic surgery and then shows the appearing of Seh-hee, running into an marked-woman; assumable that she has recently had surgery, and breaking the woman’s picture frame. Seh-hee says sorry to her and brings that frame, finding some shop around that corner to fix it. However, when she returns that woman has already gone. After that Seh-hee goes to a small coffee shop to meet Ji-woo. But at the moment she is stepping in that place, she sees her boyfriend gazing passionately on a beautiful waitress, Seh-hee feels jealous and they finally end their day with the big dispute.

Afterwards, she is intensely nervous that her lover is bored and going to stop loving herself. With her love, she decides to run away silently from his life without telling or leaving him anything, and totally changes her identity by using a plastic surgery to turn all her face and body into a new one, as we all can understand when she tells the surgeon that she does not want to be pretty, she just wants to be a new person with her new identity. With this operated appearance, she can reenter the life of her lover, Ji-woo, in the second time as his new woman by using this newly-changed identity.

During the period of her disappearance, Ji-woo, who knows nothing about the reason of her leaving, is living alone miserably and desperately with his inner dilemma; to wait hopelessly for the day that his lover to return or to stop waiting and  commencing his new love with any women.

After leaving for six months, Seh-hee returns and tries to reenter the man’s life with her new face, with her new name See-hee. Ironically, Ji-woo does not notice at all that the new-coming woman is the same person as his vanishing lover. Although Seh-hee succeeds reentering his life as See-hee, sadly she must endure the most terrible pain that he never forgets Seh-hee or herself in the past. She tries to test his love with her new identity by sending him a letter which informs him that Seh-hee is going to come back soon, unfortunately Ji-woo tells See-hee that he must leave her now because Seh-hee is returning. Undoubtedly, she cannot stand this decision and ends up their meal with the same-old routine, the big dispute which uses ironically the same dialogue as their previous dispute. Things are turned upside down from what she has been expecting for.

To cease him from leaving herself, one day she decides to tell him the truth by making an appointment with him at the coffee shop. In that day she wears a paper mask which presents the face of Seh-hee, herself before the surgery, to meet Ji-woo, claiming that she is not his ex-girlfriend, but in fact she is his new one, which is totally awkward because both of them are same person. After getting the whole story, he is very angry that he was all the time played as a fool by her; he suddenly flees the scene, leaving Seh-hee only his last sentence “you’re very frightening”. Absurdly, Ji-woo decides to turn himself to the same surgery clinic which his woman has come before, and leaves her nothing but misery for a very long period, the same way as what he was treated. Later he informs her that he will come back with his new appearance and figure, during this moment of waiting, See-hee is totally paranoid that Ji-woo can be any men who come into her life, but as soon as she notice one man who always sneaks at her is maybe Ji-woo with new operated face, this man is terribly killed in front of her by a car accident. Without knowing exactly that he is Ji-woo or not, See-hee is totally shocked and turns herself into the surgery cycle again trying to fix mental problems by rechanging her identity.

It is quiet obvious to consider the film Time as a beautiful poem which the poet named Kim Ki-Duk has composed harmonically to demonstrate his thought and message about the beauty and the plastic surgery which is one of the most regarded issues during these years in Korea and other countries around the world. We can see that nowadays the number of women, as well as men, who use this medical innovation only to build them the thing called “beauty”, has been increasing dramatically. In order to provide them the new “identity”, these people are parading to see the surgeon and have their body plastic surgery operated by which they can start their living with the new given figure. Korea, Kim’s home country, is very well-known globally for its top-ranked reputation in plastic surgery; it seems to be very normal for Korean people to have their body or face fixed by the knife of surgeons. We can evidently notice that lots of Korean celebrities, men and women in varied ages, willingly admit that his or her look and beauty are surgically created. Therefore Kim Ki-Duk makes this film to question people around the world if this social value of surgery is appropriate or not and what the beauty really is.

Through this film, the director mainly presents his opinion that plastic surgery is like shell or mask which people use to cover their true identity. In the mean time if we consider that human’s true identity is consisted of body and mind which we all have been naturally born with, changing or distorting one of these elements is equal as breaking the identity formation. According to this logic, plastic surgery, which humans use to hide or to eliminate their dislike part of body, is also destroying the formation. This means people are breaking their own identity and become selfless or non-self, which was once presented in the Buddha’s preaching as one of Three Marks of Existence called “anatta”. So they have to live selflessly, waiting the day they finally gain the new and satisfactory identity.

We can apparently notice in this film that through the story the protagonists always involve with their and other’s identity. They frequently ask other people about who they really are or what the true self exactly is, in addition, others are designed to be nameless characters by following their social role such as father, doctor, nurse, hostage, etc., all of these characters are intentionally neglected the names, no matter how important role they have in the film. Because the director aims to point out that nowadays names are invented to present people’s unique identity or to use as a tool for specifying each person, so it is able to consider it as a mask or a bark. Without this invention, we and our identities are totally invisible and finally become nobody in this world. Consequently, we might consider ourselves without name as only nobody whom we can never perceive the true identity by using only human’s perception until they decide to unmask themselves.

As I mentioned in previous paragraphs, the word “identity”, especially for people in this era, is depending on their complacency or what they satisfy. If we pay closely attention to this, it is able to say that in fact human’s pleasure or satisfaction is not certain, it can change, transform and regenerate for all the times of our lives. Kim Ki-Duk probably criticizes that humans are always looking for the thing they believe they satisfy living with it. Though in reality they get their satisfied stuff, there will always be the more satisfied things appearing in their mind, so they must go out finding to process that thing again. This process will, of course, keep repeating itself and turns into the perpetual cycle of self-satisfaction seeking.

The plastic surgery for changing natural identity is also the same as that cycle, men or women do not like their figure or appearance, they will easily change or reshape them. This means they can also change their natural identity by surgical operation, once they decide to change one part of their body, there will be more operated parts following later. This might lead these people the situation that they cannot describe their true self or identity and finally become nobody or selfless.

Finally, we can approximately conclude that the director wants to satire the present medical innovation, especially the plastic surgery, which often drags men and women into the cycle of anatta, deceives them with the artificial beauty and steals their own identity.

Besides criticizing harshly and directly to social value or culture through his films, there is one more special aspect like using symbolism which we always notice in the work of this Korean director. Kim Ki-Duk often uses symbolic elements presenting theme or messages to describe the audience additional contexts of the narrated story by using this clever method in every film he made. While the audiences are watching the film and perceiving beautiful moving images, they can symbolically read these images and transcribe them for significance to understand more about hidden messages that the director wants to tell though the story.

In Time, besides raising up the story of human’s appearance and identity which is easily changed by plastic surgery, another issue that he symbolically presents is an impermanence of life or “anicca”, one doctrine of Three Marks of Existence. The most noticeable symbol he uses is the sculpture garden which we obviously notice from the poster to the film’s last scene. This sculpture garden is a place where these people can enjoy watching or photographing the beach decorated by human’s organ-shaped sculptures such as heads, bodies, hands or legs etc. It seems to take a ferry boat crossing the sea to arrive at an island and then drive to a beach to reach the sculpture garden. In the film, we can see that both Ji-woo and Seh-hee, or after surgery See-hee, always relate their lives with this scenic place. They often took photo together with the sculptures, especially hands-shaped ladder sculpture, during their period before and after surgery.

These sculptures are symbols signifying the human beauty which is natural uncertainty or impermanence that can be changed, transformed or crumbled through every time we spent in our lives. Even though we try to find medical remedies to solve these problems; to maintain our youth or beauty, eventually we must unavoidably face them. The same way as these organ-shaped sculptures exactly is, although they seem to be very beautiful and artistic in normal time, as the time that sea level has been rising higher, they must be under water. No matter how beautiful they are, their beauty will be covered and invisible under water, like beauty of our appearance or figure which is totally unimportant and worthless when the death has approached nearby.

All characters are actually bedazzled and lost by these invented things like seeking for artificial beauty or new identity by hands of surgeons, as we can see since the beginning of the films till the final scene and everything keeps repeating itself as the cycle. While in film Ji-woo and See-hee are addicted to transforming their identity, many people in real world are still looking for the exit door from the cycle of being selfless or nobody.

Another outstanding aspect that we can notice in this film is time. In this work of Kim Ki-Duk, time, as its title, is significantly important, not only in the title of the film but also many parts the director indirectly mentions about time such as the clock-ticking sound. Even Seh-hee and Ji-woo are obviously concerning about time in their lives, as we can hear she says in the film that “I’m afraid of time because it has a power to change all the things”, that is why Kim Ki-Duk tries to make fun with these characters by putting them into a period of moment where time has been frozen and stopped at one point according to the cycle where anything goes repeatedly and always comes back at the same point.

Therefore it is possible to assume that when the time restarts itself at the beginning of the cycle for one more time, there is still an opportunity for Seh-hee or See-hee to fix her problem and restart her life again. But in fact this can only be in her dream because although she has erased her old identity and replaced the new one, her story must estimably end at the same point as it always does due to her habit will never change.  So lastly it looks impossible for both of them, Seh-hee and Ji-woo, to return living together. In the story, Seh-hee is always afraid that time will break their relationship, but as we all know that she has started breaking it by herself since the day she stepped into a plastic surgery clinic and let the surgeon operate and change her figure identity. Like we see at the end of the film that ladder sculpture which was formally consisted of two sides of hands, in this scene when the sea level has been rising, in this time we can only see that sculpture is changed and turned into one hand ladder. This may represent to the relationship of these protagonists that is torn apart when there is another thing cover their appearance, their figure and absolutely their identity.

At the end of the film, we can see the director intend to replay the same footage as the beginning, which See-hee, or actually Seh-hee, runs into a masked-woman after that woman walks out of the surgery clinic. But in this time, See-hee, herself, is the marked-woman, walking out of the clinic and being hit by a hasty woman who walks on the street. These two scenes, the beginning and the end, are definitely the same. So this scene is like a parody accentuating that everything she, Seh-hee, has done since the beginning is committing or sticking her to the cycle that she cannot escape according to the last part of the film, we can see See-hee tells the surgeon, after he asking if she wants her old appearance, she neglects his offer and insists the surgeon to give her the new identity.

Buddha once taught his followers about the doctrine called Three Marks of Existence or three common characters which all elements in the world must encounter in life from their birth till their death, consisted of impermanence (anicca), suffering (dukkha) and selfless (anatta). If anything is destined to follow this path and end at the same destination; death, it seems worthless to get tired, suffered and lost in this cycle of identity-seeking. Because after our death everyone will finally become selfless, our surgery operated body may be only an empty vessel which has no name, no remark or no fame which artificial beauty is still not necessary at all for us.

For all this, it is able to consider medical cosmetic as plastic surgery is only a wasteful treatment for us, human beings. We must not get ourselves addicted to it and not forget our natural-born identity. However, for those people who start changing or erasing their own identity and also those who start thinking about this process, we are really sorry for you and. in final, may welcome you all to the eternal cycle of becoming selfless that once you step in this loop, it is very difficult to get yourself out of it, like Seh-hee did in the film.

“I’m afraid of time because it has a power to change all the things” – Seh-hee

Posted in Movie | 3 Comments

โลกกลม

มีคนบอกไว้ว่า 

เพราะว่าโลกกลม

โลกจึงหมุน

………………..

อืมม มองดูดีๆ 

ตัวเราเองก็กลมๆแฮะ

เริ่มหมุนตามโลกมั่งดีกว่า

………………..

ยินดีต้อนรับสู่บล๊อคโลกกลมครับ

Posted in Etc. | 2 Comments